Saturday, 12 April 2008

THE HOME OF DEMOCRACY

Nobody does corruption like the UK.

“Gordon Brown yesterday won Conservative backing for a move that would allow the government to block future criminal investigations such as the corruption case against the [private] arms company BAE Systems.”

When an opposition party supports the government on an issue that is so obviously corrupt and could play as a vote-winner if exploited properly in the media, you know you’re in trouble.

“[UK High Court] judges said: ‘We fear for the reputation of the administration of justice if it can be perverted by a threat.’”

That threat being, of course, continuing to allow our rulers to block investigations into overtly corrupt practices that are often carried out in our names but are always, quite clearly, solely in their interest. That interest being lining their own, slimy, self-righteous pockets, or the pockets of their fellow, self-serving sleazebags.

The judges went on:

“No one, whether within this country or outside, is entitled to interfere with the course of … justice. The rule of law is nothing if it fails to constrain overweening power."

But what course of justice is this ‘overweening power’ perverting? Isn’t this perversion only necessary when the national interest is at stake?

Hmm, maybe…

Like lining the pockets of the despotic and morally bankrupt rulers of, consequently, one of the most financially and morally corrupt states on the planet – Saudi Arabia – in order to sell the country arms to help them(?)/us(?) achieve some Allahforsaken purpose: guess it’ll have something to do with oil, but that’s a right tangly snake that we won’t even try to unravel here.

Like the illegal invasion of Iraq to destroy WMD’s … er … no … er … to oust Saddam? Yeah, that’s it because … well, he was a bastard, wasn’t he?

And there may be a little connection with oil there, too, methinks.

Anything else…

Maybe awarding peerages to anyone willing to stump up enough money to allow Tony to continuing sending his kids to Catholic schools and still have a little change for the collection plate on Sundays. And also maybe to allow him and his dynamic successor to bulldoze through parliament proposals that, in just over five years, contemptuously piss on liberties fought for and gained over centuries.

Lying to people about the risks in joining company pension schemes, indeed, encouraging them to do so. Result: 125,000 people lose their entire investment. Who cares? No-one.

I could go on but that’ll have to suffice for now. I think these examples do enough to highlight that the ‘national interest’ seems more often than not to be connected to private business and lining the pockets of those with a large enough stake in it. Those with such a stake coming from both ends (are there two ends now, or is that just another fucking illusion?) of the political spectrum. The establishment basically. No wonder they’re collaborating with each other on this one.

They’ve been shitting on us from day one, and they’ll continue to shit on us from now until eternity and you know how they’ll get away with it?

  • Immigrants
  • Muslims
  • Communists
  • Catholics
  • Suffragettes
  • Ravers
  • Miners
  • The Chinese
  • Russians
  • New Age Travellers
  • Blacks
  • Union members
  • Hippies
  • Students
  • Single mothers
  • The unemployed
  • The bogeyman

Delete as appropriate.

As long as we keep looking at them - us - or having our heads pointed in their – our – direction, they’ll carry on doing what they’ve always done with this scornful impunity, so you’d better smile and enjoy the ride people as there’s nothing else to do. If you try, you can just add yourself to list above and be seen as a cause rather than a solution, and suffer all the infringements on your civil liberty that that incurs.

But, then again, isn’t that happening anyway?

Quotations taken from:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/12/bae.defence

Thursday, 10 April 2008

HEAR NO EVIL, SEE NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL

No trouble on the San Francisco leg of the relay of the Olympic torch; that’s alright then. As spokespeople for the IOC and the Beijing Olympics parroted often enough, it must have just been a few separatists.

Well, I don’t mind admitting it when I’m wrong.

Sorry.

Of course, the fact that this leg of the relay went off without a hitch may have something to do with the fact that they changed the route and kept the bloody thing hidden from view – mainstream media players excepting, of course – for the duration of its proud skulk.

Turning a blind eye doesn’t make a problem go away; it exacerbates it, dickheads! No wonder eighty per cent* of the ‘developed’ world’s citizens are so disillusioned as their disfranchisement becomes apparent. At the moment most of these feelings manifest themselves in cynical apathy (hello!), which is all good in maintaining the status quo, but you can only kick sand in someone’s face for so long before they decide that it’s time to do something about it, so carry on with your blatant disregard for the opinions and feelings of the populace; I just hope you’re ready to reap what you’re sowing. Yeah, I know, this last bit’s slightly naïve, given what hasn’t happened over the last x-amount of years, but you’ve gotta have hope, haven’t you?

So what’s the point of parading the flame if you’re not parading it to anyone, except to a non-discriminatory camera?

The point is, propa-bleedin’-ganda!

We all criticise – quite rightly – the Nazi regime, which incidentally conceived the Olympic flame tradition and were masters of propaganda, just because it provides a convenient distraction to the crap that’s carried out in our names everywhere everyday. OK, they may have been one more step along the bar of bastardy, but we’re on it, too, and unless we make any attempt to move the other way and shift the balance, we’re gonna keep sliding along the trail of shit they leave behind until the incline is so steep that we’ll never get back to bearable bastardy or – who knows – maybe some niceness.

How do we do that without getting off our pacified arses?

Answers on a postcard to...

* The other 17 per cent composed of: Daily Mail or the equivalent readers, those with an ikkle bitty stake in the status quo, the ignorant, and the naïve. The other 3 per cent having a huge stake and just being complete bastards.

Wednesday, 9 April 2008

I'VE GOT NO CLEAN PANTS TO WEAR

Big news story of the day...

As part of the media's latest campaign to discredit anything relating to Heathrow's new Terminal 5, today's latest scandalous story is about them losing a dead man's luggage...

How bothered do you think he is???

And another thing: who noticed the luggage was missing and reported it as so? Must be the same guy who voted, for example, for George Bush in 2004, Tony Blair in 2005 and Robert Mugabe just recently.

Tuesday, 8 April 2008

AHA!

So after six months and ten million pounds we discover that Diana was killed in a car accident.

Glad that's all been cleared up.

Apparently, in the next Oliver Stone movie we discover that JFK was killed by a bullet shot through the skull and that humans talk, monkeys walk and fish don't do either.

It's all making sense to me now.

Monday, 7 April 2008

Y'GOTTA LOVE THE FRENCH

Why? Cos they know how to do a protest. Flame extinguished three times and the ceremony to welcome it cancelled. That's how you protest. If only the English weren't, generally, so sheep-like and easy to manipulate. Guess that's why so many of them dislike the French - one of the main reasons why anyone dislikes another: jealousy.

Anyway, a quick link to one version of the story:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7334545.stm

"So the behaviour of a few separatists would not gain sympathy from people and will cause strong criticism and is doomed to fail."

Nice quote from Wang Hui - spokesman for the Beijing Olympic organising committee. Is he referring to The Peckham Liberation Front in the Republic of London, or The Louvre Independence Party in Le Republique de Paris? Both, I guess. They've both been stirring up a lot of hostility lately and no doubt saw this relay as an ideal opportunity to draw the international community's attention to their perceived plight at the hands of their respective Municipal Mussolinis.

BLOOD ON ALL OUR HANDS

Not entirely sure about the proposal as a whole but at least it's some kind of an idea, and you can't really argue with the gist of the piece and, if you do, then you probably don't know me and are reading this by accident.

So, if you've got the time and the inclination, take a look at the following:

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/johann-hari-boycotting-the-beijing-olympics-wont-work-but-heres-a-proposal-that-just-might-805408.html

Sunday, 6 April 2008

THE OLYMPIC TORCH

Disgraceful to see so many people willing to carry the torch. Oh, they say that the spirit of the Olympics is peace, not politics, but what about the peace of those living in Tibet? What about, surely, the importance of a host government that reflects that spirit of peace and friendship?

At best, pure ignorance.

At worst, pure self-interest, but at least that would demontrate some self-awareness. At least we know that governments and others are too scared to do or say anything that may harm that most important spirit: the spirit of economic co-operation. Self-righteous, self-serving hypocrites!

Still, given the human rights records of, hmm, let me think, the USA, the UK and all the other sheep nations in the war-on-terror collaboration, and Russia, then maybe we'd all better shut up and look closer to home before we start criticising others.

The spirit of the Olympics is national grandstanding and always has been; why should it be any different now? If you wish to try and make your voice heard and protest against China, then please do so, but don't forget there's been plenty going on at home for the last X amount of years to say something about and you haven't; what's different now?

If you're going to, make the Chinese government the rule, not the exception, and try and do what little you can to obstruct and embarass all bastards on their paths, otherwise it just smacks of, take your pick:
  • anti-Chineseism
  • bandwagon jumping
  • cowardice
  • ignorance